Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juncheng Shang vs Taro Daniel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shang vs Daniel analysis and find out who is favored!
Juncheng Shang vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shang 0 - 0 Daniel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shang has won 51.59% of points on his second serve, while Daniel has won 49.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shang, in recent form, has won 51.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 48.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.42% and 27.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shang has saved 61.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 62.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shang has won 58.46% of matches played (W/L 38/ 27), with Daniel winning 53.52% (W/L 38/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 38/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 304/ 199), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Shang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shang has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.22 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 256.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shang has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shang has converted 35.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 40.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
92
Rank
89
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
80
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
62% (104-64)
Career Total W/L
58% (550-394)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
43% (13-17)
$690,570
Career Prize Money
$2,178,754
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juncheng Shang | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 43% (13/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (40/35) | 44% (31/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (368/369) | 48% (328/350) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 38% (5/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 134 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:27 | 1:46:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 152.79 | 183.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1522/2409) | 60% (1304/2179) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1012/1522) | 69% (901/1304) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (463/887) | 50% (437/875) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (87/244) | 41% (69/169) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (937/2409) | 36% (760/2110) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 55% (6/5) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 56% (10/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (15/6) | 7% (15/1) |
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Juncheng Shang
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Juncheng Shang
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Hugo Gaston
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Juncheng Shang
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
62 of
120)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Corentin Moutet
71%
(
97 of
136)
1st Serve %
64%
(
98 of
154)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
62 of
98)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
35%
(
48 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
62 of
154)
150
Total Points Won
140
|
6-7(9) 6-2 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Taro Daniel
50%
(
65 of
129)
1st Serve %
46%
(
73 of
158)
17
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
6
89%
(
58 of
65)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
55 of
73)
56%
(
36 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
27%
(
35 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
65 of
158)
159
Total Points Won
128
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Taro Daniel
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
11
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
20 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
2
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Shang Vs Daniel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
